Deputy Attorney General Bradley Weinsheimer letter(s) waiving executive privilege re Jan 6th
On July 26, 2021 Deputy Attorney Bradley Weinsheimer letter(s) executive privilege went to the following individuals (see Scribd Link to the 18 pages) I briefly discussed this in a recently published article, found here or click the link below)
—the following DOJ (former) employees…see House OverSight links to each letter
Click here to read the letter to Jeffrey Rosen.
Click here to read the letter to Richard P. Donoghue.
Click here to read the letter to Patrick Hovakimian.
Click here to read the letter to Byung Jin Pak.
Click here to read the letter to Bobby L. Christine.
Click here to read the letter to Jeffrey B. Clark. The House Oversight Chairwoman also released a statement/press release -which reads in part
“The Oversight Committee is investigating former President Trump’s brazen attempts to pressure the Justice Department to try to overturn the 2020 election. I am pleased that the Justice Department has recognized that the Committee has ‘compelling legislative interests’ in understanding the ‘extraordinary events’ surrounding President Trump’s conduct, and that DOJ has authorized key officials to provide ‘unrestricted testimony’ to the Committee without asserting claims of privilege. I expect prompt cooperation from these witnesses, and I am committed to getting to the bottom of the previous Administration’s attempts to subvert the Justice Department and reverse a free and fair election.”
The DOJ letters now authorize the aforementioned individuals serving under the former Trump Administration officials to sit for Committee interviews regarding former President Trump’s efforts to enlist DOJ officials to help him overturn the 2020 election…and thus subverting our Democracy
Given the DOJ’s written authorization of the various key DOJ officials, directing them to now provide ‘unrestricted testimony’ to the various Congressional Committees, sans asserting “claims of executive privilege” I would expect that the various Chairs of the various Congressional Committees will expect immediate and prompt cooperation from these Key DOJ Witnesses , and further elucidate the previous Administration’s actual attempts to subvert (and arguably hijack) the Justice Department as a cudgel and weaponize the DOJ to reverse the 2020 free and fair election.
the House Oversight Committee has requested the appearance of:
“…Former Acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen, Former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, Former Acting Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue, Former Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Clark, Former Associate Deputy Attorney General Patrick Hovakimian, Former U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia Byung Jin Pak, and Former Acting U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia Bobby Christine appear for transcribed interviews regarding any efforts by President Trump and others to advance unsubstantiated allegations of voter fraud or seek to overturn the 2020 election”
Last month I walked you through the documents and the growing evidence that various Congressional Committees had obtained. And I think I did a decent job highlighting what was important…
Again the documents mentioned in Today’s House Oversight Statement - I walked you through those documents last month - you can click here to read the June 15th documents that were previously released
But I really do have to get back to my bonbons, it’s not like they are going to eat themselves. I felt I owed my readers/followers an update and access to the aforementioned DOJ letters. Because facts should always matter. Equally important is unfettered access to public documents, which has always been paramount, at least for me … and today I’m not trying to be a document hoarding asshole, maybe tomorrow I will be but certainly not today.
If anyone can give me a logical explanation why some continue to choose hoarding public documents, I’m all ears. Notwithstanding until such time a factual argument is presented, you need to stop giving your critical thinking away to some who don’t deserve it. If an account regularly engages in document hoarding you do understand the subtext of their insecure behavior … they want you to be solely reliant on them for facts or what ever narrative they are trying to push—when truth be told the vast majority of the time they continue to traffic in insane QANON-for-the-Left conspiracy theories. And consistently espouse disinformation and misinformation with a side helping of misogyny and anti-semitism.
So be smarter than the lemmings… said person is the human embodiment of a garbage dumpster on fire and that is not meant as a compliment, at all. Facts don’t need ALL CAPs and prolific emojis typically used in a self aggrandizing non-sequitur threads that read like a derangement manifesto of an completely unhinge individual. Who has a cult like following. It’s all so tawdry and gross and I’ll never understood why so many are fooled by their prognostications.