Graydon Young - plea agreement and statement of Offense -both documents embedded
I’m going to repeat the last paragraph of the Statement of Offense is pretty important - and his plea agreement is pretty standard even the “covert law enforcement” section but it’s not as important
See the Official DOJ-OPA Press Release
See the Thread to Defendant Young’s June 23, 2021 Plea Hearing
Defendant Young’s signed plea agreement or via my public drive
Pleaded guilty to Counts 1 and 2 of SR4
Defendant Young pleaded guilty to: Counts 1 and 2 in the Fourth Superseding Indictment, charging your client with Conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and Obstruction of Congress, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2).
Factual Stipulations
Your client agrees that the attached “Statement of Offense” fairly and accurately describes your client’s actions and involvement in the offense(s) to which your client is pleading guilty.
Estimated Offense Level Under the Guidelines
As previously stated - the estimated level is 29
Government agreed to 3-level reduction
In addition, the parties agree that, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5E1.2, should the Court impose a fine, at Guidelines level 26, the estimated applicable fine range is $25,000 to $250,000. Your client reserves the right to ask the Court not to impose any applicable fine.
Defendant Young’s Cooperation
Largely what you would expect - and pretty standard
Your client shall testify fully, completely and truthfully before any and all Grand Juries in the District of Columbia and elsewhere, and at any and all trials of cases or other court proceedings in the District of Columbia and elsewhere, at which your client’s testimony may be deemed relevant by the Government.
Restitution
Formulaically I am curious as to how the Government came up with Defendant Young’s $2,000.00 in restitution (which is mandatory)
Your client acknowledges that the riot that occurred on January 6, 2021, caused as of May 17, 2021, approximately $1,495,326.55 damage to the United States Capitol. Your client agrees as part of the plea in this matter to pay restitution to the Department of Treasury in the amount of $2,000.
Statement of Offenses
Via DDC-ECF https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/doc1/04518605034 or via my public drive
…the defendant, Graydon Young, with the concurrence of his attorney, agree and stipulate to the below factual basis for the defendant’s guilty plea—that is, if this case were to proceed to trial, the parties stipulate that the United States could prove the below facts beyond a reasonable doubt…
In advance of January 6, 2021, Mr. Young coordinated with certain individuals and affiliates of the Oath Keepers – referred to here as “the co-conspirators” – in making plans for what Mr. Young and the co-conspirators would be doing in Washington, D.C., on January 6.
Mr. Young and at least some of the co-conspirators discussed the need to maintain operational security and accordingly used encrypted messaging applications to communicate with one another.
On January 4, 2021, Mr. Young flew from Florida to North Carolina, and the next day drove with at least one of the co-conspirators to the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area.
The Stack… Defendant Young and Co-Conspirators
Some NEW details reads like there’s another person who hasn’t been charged
Mr. Young then joined together with at least some of the co-conspirators in walking up the stairs on the east side of the U.S. Capitol in a “stack” formation, with each person keeping a hand on the shoulder of the person in front.
At around 2:40 p.m., Mr. Young was present with at least some of the co-conspirators on the plaza outside the east Rotunda doors of the U.S. Capitol. At least some of the co-conspirators and other individuals pushed against U.S. Capitol Police officers and the east Rotunda doors, eventually forcing open the doors. The doors were significantly damaged. Mr. Young and at least some of the co-conspirators then unlawfully entered the U.S. Capitol Building itself.
IMPORTANT 👇🏻
This proffer of evidence is not intended to constitute a complete statement of all facts known by Mr. Young or the government. Rather, it is a limited statement of facts intended to provide the minimal necessary factual predicate for Mr. Young’s guilty plea.
And with that you should be fully caught up - again
Defendant Young’s signed plea agreement or via my public drive
Statement of Offense DDC-ECF https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/doc1/04518605034 or via my public drive
And you can access the complete list of Court filings via the Caldwell Folder on my public drive
While 'I' feel like the doors would amount to more than $2000, in regards to "How did they come up with $2000," I know in yours and my work we deal with what is and is not 'objective facts.' My strong assumption here would be that: 1) They can not assign an amount to him for anything they don't have on film of him damaging, so this is the estimate of what they OBJECTIVELY have on film and have him dead to rights, 2) If it is the door, per se, which I argue is likely far more than $2000 to replace, his 'share' of the damage could be estimated to be $2000. A "Piece of the property damage pie" so to speak. If he is visibly on film with two other conspirators severely damaging 'said' door, and the damage comes to $6000 for example, seems more reasonable, $2000, $2000, $2000. Make sense?