Oscar Amos Stilley v Dr Alan Braid re Texas SB-8 facts versus disinformation
Calm down -but come on why are facts so hard to be accurately reported . Bejesus I was literally on a 3 day sabbatical but it’s not my job to Police the rampant disinformation and misinformation
Look I really need to detach myself from the Texas SB-8 but I think my readers deserve to know the facts.
Dr Alan Brian’s OpEd:
"On the morning of Sept. 6, I provided an abortion to a woman who, though still in her first trimester, was beyond the state's new limit. I acted because I had a duty of care to this patient, as I do for all patients, and because she has a fundamental right to receive this care," Dr. Alan Braid, a physician in San Antonio. His op-ed was published on Saturday September 18, 2021 via The Washington Post.
Yes there are multiple judicial tracks running almost parallel with each other - numerous State of Texas civil cases concerning SB-8… I’ve previously walked you through the two State of Texas and DOJ civil complaints concerning Texas SB-8
Plaintiff is a disbarred & disgraced former attorney -Oscar Amos Stilley-
Because facts matter and anyone with a reasonable and basic understanding of how our Federal Judicial system works knows how to search archives of the Department of Justice.
March 2009 Indictment of Stilley
To be clear this isn’t my opinion, which is largely immaterial this is about facts that you can prove with the DOJ-OPA and/or ECF filings of Criminal Case against Stilley and his co-defendant. See Original 2009 DOJ-OPA Press Release
The Indictment charges Conspiracy to Defraud the United States, Tax Evasion and Failure to File Tax Returns. Springer used the name Bondage Breakers Ministry to solicit and receive money. Springer’s stated purpose for Bondage Breakers Ministry was “to get rid of the Internal Revenue Service.”
The Indictment alleges that Stilley, an attorney, assisted Springer’s tax evasion through a variety of means. Stilley maintained an interest bearing account, called an Arkansas IOLTA Foundation Trust account, which lawyers use to deposit and hold client funds. The pair allegedly used the IOLTA account and various other devices such as cashier’s checks, check cashing services, money orders, cash and other means to conceal Springer’s actual income and avoid creating the usual records of financial institution
United States v. Springer
Case No 4:09-cr-00043 -District Court - Northern District of Oklahoma
…Springer allegedly told IRS employees that all funds he receives are gifts and donations to his ministry and that he does not have any income and he does not provide any services for payment.
The indictment lists numerous transactions involving hundreds of thousands of dollars between Springer and Stilley that flowed through the IOLTA account, such as $166,000 paid out in August 2005 to purchase a motor home titled in the name of Springer and his wife, and a September 2005 payment of $25,813 to purchase a Lexus automobile titled in Springer’s name. Furthermore, the Indictment states that neither Springer or Stilley have filed an income tax return since the late 1980’s. Springer faces five counts alleging criminal violations of the federal tax laws for the years 2000, and 2002 through 2005…
$375,059.90 via AK IOLTA Foundation Trust account
The Federal Court ultimately found Defendant Stilley and his then co-defendant in the tax evasion scheme. Both were held responsible for more than $1 million each in federal tax losses and was ordered to pay $700,000 in restitution to the Internal Revenue Service.
April 28, 2010 Final Judgement
See ECF link for six page final judgment entered by the Court on April 28, 2010 which handed down a lengthy sentence (or see my Scribd Link) -more on this conviction later because most won’t understand what I’m about to explain. For nearly a decade Defendant Stilley has litigated his conviction all the way to to Supreme Court, which ultimately denied his petition.
The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a total: 180 months. Sixty months as to each of Counts One, Three. and Four, all such tenns to run consecutively to each other.
Convicted Felon Oscar Stilley, filed the civil complaint pro se ← not exactly smart given he has been disbarred. His website is off the walls bananas and I’m almost reluctant to amplify his website. But the disclosure on page 1 of his 4 page civil complaint is …well here you can read it- but I’m telling you to stick with me, I’ll wrap this up in a tiny neatly tied bow…
Plaintiff is currently on home confinement, in the custody of the United States Department of Justice-Federal Bureau of Prisons, (DOJ-FBOP) serving the 12 year of a 15 year federal sentence on utterly fraudulent federal charges of “tax evasion” and “conspiracy,” all of which repeatedly changed and morphed away from the purported grand jury indictment, to whatever new theory the government chose to espouse at a given time
No really if you’re asking me what my opinion is - read paragraph 4 of Stilley’s Texas SB-8 Complaint —this isn’t about the Texas SB-8 it’s actually about Defendant Stilley’s desire to throw out his conviction and it might work but I kind of have faith that the State of Texas Judiciary might look at this 4 page Civil Complaint and toss it. Because the subtext (I really wish the media would focus on the underlying reasons) here is crystal clear — Stilley is using the Texas SB-8 to once again re-litigate his lawful conviction of Tax Fraud and Evasion. In 2011 the US Circuit Court of Appeals UPHELD his conviction and UPHELD his disbarment
…judgment and commitment order was based upon false testimony, claimed evidence which was clearly contradicted by the record, etc., all of which the government steadfastly refuses to acknowledge and correct despite ethical obligations promptly so to do.
Oh did you think I wouldn’t provide you with the 2020 filings and US Court of Appeals Mandate *see ECF for August 2020 Mandate -To be clear this applies to his co-defendant BUT…yes there’s always a but what I’m vexed about is why the media hasn’t actually reported the following because I genuinely think it’s important to know that Defendant
MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Oscar Stilley's Motion to Stay Proceedings and for Determination of Who is the Lawfully Authorized Judge on this Case (Re: 702 MOTION Disclose co-defendant's address, show authority for Friot to preside, 30 day stay of proceedings ) by USA as to Oscar Amos Stilley…
The footnotes - what do I always say about the damn footnotes?
The United States separately moved to dismiss Mr. Stilley’s Section 2255 motion (Dkt. # 701) both because it was untimely, having been filed more than nine-years after the limitations period, and because it was filed in violation of the local rules regarding the length of motions and briefs. Dkt. # 704.
IMPORTANT - Stilley did not seek a petition for writ of certiorari…
And that’s why Footnote #1 is actually important because Defendant Stilley’s Motion is both improper and untimely …but I’m telling you right now (like I know the sun will rise tomorrow morning) that Stilley is using the Texas SB-8 “civil complaint” as a separate cudgel to essentially hi-jack SB-8 for his own personal gain.
May 12, 2021, Mr. Stilley filed a motion before this Court, asserting he sought compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), pursuant to recent amendments to that section under the First Step Act of 2018. (Dkt. #s 694 and 695).
In his motion Mr. Stilley identified no basis for compassionate release, but instead recited a litany of “Facts Showing Entitlement to Relief” each attacking Mr. Stilley’s conviction and sentence. In short, Mr. Stilley sought to have this Court reverse its and the Tenth Circuit’s previous rulings. By order dated July 26, 2021, this Court denied Mr. Stilley’s motion for relief under the First Step Act
ORDER (see ECF Link) by Judge Stephen P Friot - ruling on motion(s)/document(s) or see Scribd Link
Re: 708 MOTION to Clarify Whether or Not Response to Motion is Required Absent Scheduling Order MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion
707 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Oscar Stilley's Motion to Stay Proceedings and for Determination of Who is the Lawfully Authorized Judge on this Case ) as to Oscar Amos Stilley
So if the media would actually read the USA v Stilley docket then they would know that Defendant Stilley isn’t exactly the bastion of “Rule of Law” and that he’s recent Texas SB-8 Civil Lawsuit is what any parasite would do -misappropriation of a deeply problematic assault on a Woman’s constitutional right to choose for his own benefit.
And NOPE the media can’t see how Stilley’s 4-dimensional chessboard is actually littered with numerous judicial landmines. But I’m not a reporter and according to some I’m just a board alcoholic housewife who didn’t cheat on their spouse. So there’s that fun-fact-nugget of “oh sweetie no, I have the text and emails”
Defendant/Plaintiff Stilley’s Blog Post announcing he had filed the first civil complaint regarding Texas’ SB-8 - no really read pages 3 & 4 Stilley is out of his mind and the FACT he called the Dr —on September 20, 2021 -see paragraph 25 —I wonder if Stilley made any threats to the Dr — if so then I would think the FBI and DOJ might step in because I can think of at least 4 federal laws that Stilley may have broken with his September 20, 2021 telephone call
On the merits of Stilley’s Complaint - it sucks, like holy crap you use to be an officer of the Court, yet you didn’t run a spell check?
Paragraph 16. “On information and belief, Defendant is kind and patient and helpful toward bastards, but ideologically opposed to forcing any woman to produce another bastard against her own free will.”
“Plaintiff on the morning of September 20, 2021 placed a call to the office of Defendant, to inquire whether or not Defendant might repent of his ideology as well as his deeds, and agree never to perform another abortion contrary to the enactments of the Texas legislature in general, and the requirements of Senate Bill 8 in particular.”
Again I get it that most would have never thought to look at Defendant Stilley’s 2009 Indictment and arch of his criminal case but I think it’s important that you have the tangible facts by way of verified federal court filings. I don’t see how Defendant/Plaintiff Stilley Civil Complaint will be viable. But hey if a convicted felon wants to use Texas SB-8 as a cudgel to attack his lawful conviction - have at it —also there’s a reason I cited the previous TRO and current preliminary injunction both are in Travis and Harris County TX.
Dr Braid is in Brexar County and I’m not certain any Women’s Reproductive Advocacy Group has filed in the State of Texas - Brexar County -ergo the two previous State of Texas’ Judicial District 45 and 250 are not applicable to Brexar County abortion providers… but I haven’t run an extensive search of the Brexar County’s Court system. Although my preliminary search shows no cases have been filed in Brexar County concerning a TRO and/or preliminary injunction. I hope that makes sense, it’s been a long work day
BTW Stilley’s July 1, 2021 Facebook Post is a thing of a recalcitrant convicted felon who’s literally making fun of his current home confinement
I guess it's not surprising that someone like Stilley has stepped into the spotlight
Just: uuughhhhhhhhhhhhh