5 Comments
Sep 22, 2022Liked by File411

Re:

“…the district court concluded that Plaintiff did not show that the United States acted in callous disregard of his constitutional rights...No party contests the district court’s finding in this regard. The absence of this “indispensab[le]” factor in the Richey analysis is reason enough to conclude that the district court abused its discretion in exercising equitable jurisdiction here. Chapman, 559 F.2d at 406. But for the sake of completeness, we consider the remaining factors.”

Absolutely epic, isn't it?!! And thank you for fitting an analysis into your busy, busy workday, Mic.

Expand full comment
author

I’d say if this isn’t a wholesale repudiation of Trump’s fallacious arguments—then I’m not sure there is anything better than this unpublished opinion. By page 6 I was out loud snort laughing

Expand full comment
Sep 22, 2022Liked by File411

What an epic slap down!

Expand full comment

What happens now that Judge Cannon has revised her order striking the parts that the 11th circuit pointed out? Does that make the appellate moot and now cannot be appealed to the SC by the plantiff?

Expand full comment
author

The portion of Cannon’s Order regarding the classified documents, has been vacated by the CCOAs. The Government’s initial appeal specifically carved out the classified documents— on the other hand the Special Master Report/Status doesn’t look good for Trump because the SM is essentially telling Trump put up or shut up regarding his purported declassification.

Expand full comment