I'm hooked on a feeling, I'm high on believing ... oh, wait, wrong venue ... but a serious question - 1st case sentence was 30 months, so do they now "add on" to that with the 2nd case? I bow down to your masterful ability to keep this all straight
I'm hooked on a feeling, I'm high on believing ... oh, wait, wrong venue ... but a serious question - 1st case sentence was 30 months, so do they now "add on" to that with the 2nd case? I bow down to your masterful ability to keep this all straight
Absolutely and I’m glad you asked -in the article I explained that in the Nike case Avenatti had no criminal record, NOW he does and while most pundits are saying he’s going to get a drastically reduced sentence (remember he’s facing a maximum of 22 years) the Judge will undoubtedly factor in “prior acts yo” and that he was previously convicted. Meaning in the Clifford’s embezzlement verdict the Judge will factor in his prior conviction
But if you’re asking me - I’m betting the house on his CDCA criminal case. I believe he was facing a maximum of <820 years but there’s been a lot of twist and turns in the CDCA case, so it’s best to just wait and see.
I'm hooked on a feeling, I'm high on believing ... oh, wait, wrong venue ... but a serious question - 1st case sentence was 30 months, so do they now "add on" to that with the 2nd case? I bow down to your masterful ability to keep this all straight
Absolutely and I’m glad you asked -in the article I explained that in the Nike case Avenatti had no criminal record, NOW he does and while most pundits are saying he’s going to get a drastically reduced sentence (remember he’s facing a maximum of 22 years) the Judge will undoubtedly factor in “prior acts yo” and that he was previously convicted. Meaning in the Clifford’s embezzlement verdict the Judge will factor in his prior conviction
But if you’re asking me - I’m betting the house on his CDCA criminal case. I believe he was facing a maximum of <820 years but there’s been a lot of twist and turns in the CDCA case, so it’s best to just wait and see.
and oh yeah, today's teoria dei giochi oggi is 295