Dear John -you unjustly enriched yourself by selling your Jan6th footage

And no matter how many times you regurgitate your argument, the Court was not persuaded by your argument,—irrespective of how many times you regurgitate it.

Well Happy Monday to you and yours. As I previously indicated I decided to take the weekend off. Thusly taking my own advise of “self care” —Burning the candies at both ends eventually catches up to you. And this week (fingers crossed) I’m able to attend various Committee meetings remotely versus driving nearly three hours each way. I can see the light at the end of this legislative tunnel. That being just a few more weeks, when the gavel closes the 2022/2023 legislative session. The majority of my family and friends know that from Thanksgiving to early March it’s like a never ending sprinting marathon. And I don’t have a ton of free time.

Your daily dose of saltwater therapy…

file411_dc

A post shared by File411 (@file411_dc)

Defendant John Sullivan…

In late December 2021, I walked you through the recent motions concerning John E Sullivan aka JaydenX. Understanding the background will help you understand the recent docket activity. Because Defendant Sullivan is still fighting the “account freeze” aka seizure of the tens of thousands of dollars he was paid by mainstream news outlets (like NBC, CNN, Murdoch media group). But what you should know is Defendant Sullivan has (repeatedly) attempted to fight multiple fights -which range from dismissal of his indictment & subsequent superseding indictment, return of the funds that the government sought to seize by way of forfeiture. Generally speaking, when Defendants seek to profit off of their criminal activity, the Government and the Courts tend to be less flexible, for obvious reasons. See December 2021 update

John Sullivan’s request to release seized funds DENIED -with serious analysis by the Court

In addition below, albeit in reverse chronological order are the various previously published articles..

• February 18, 2021 John Earle Sullivan aka InsurgenceUSA

• March 24, 2021 John Sullivan Case Update

• May 23, 2021 John Earl Sullivan you can’t profit off of your crimes

December 2021 to Jan 10, 2022 docket update(s)

In order to help you navigate and ultimately understand the recent filings, I’ve including the links below:

• December 31, 2021 - MOTION to Dismiss Case Motion to Dismiss Count 1 of Superseding Indictment and Motion to Adopt and Join Motion in 21-cr-28 by JOHN EARLE SULLIVAN (see Scribd link for Dec 31st filing)

• Defendant submits that the interests of judicial economy will best be served by permitting the joinder and adoption of arguments presented in the Motion to Dismiss Count 2 of the Indictment in United States v. Joseph Caldwell, and by joining and adopting the pending Motion for Reconsideration in 21-cr-28 (APM),

• January 3, 2022 - Memorandum in Opposition by USA as to JOHN EARLE SULLIVAN re 61 MOTION for Reconsideration Motion for Reconsideration of December 6, 2021 Order Denying Motion to Remove Seizure Order

It’s important that if you choose to not read any of the recent filings, that you understand Defendants are essentially barred from taking multiple bites at the Apple. In Defendant Sullivan’s Motion for Reconsideration -the Government correctly asserts that Defendant Sullivan’s Motion seeks to ameliorate the infirmities that the Court found and articulated in detail (see Scribd link for previous filings and the Court’s December 2022 Order)

……thus, motions for reconsideration are “‘subject to the caveat that, where litigants have once battled for the Court's decision, they should neither be required, nor without good reason permitted, to battle for it again.’” United States v. Sunia, 643 F. Supp. 2d 51, 61 (D.D.C. 2009). The defendant’s motion – which attemptsto supplement his claim of financial need, and makes no claim of a change in law or clear error – falls well short of the demanding standard that reconsideration merits.

…defendant earned at least $90,875 in proceeds from his January 6 footage…

Which is in fact a textbook representation of “unjust enrichment” -if you recall in January 2021 thru March 2021 Defendant Sullivan either willfully lied to the Court and/or PreTrial Services because initially he stated monthly expenses between $2,000 to $2,250 -since then the Defendant has repeatedly increased his purported monthly living expenses in his attempt to convince the Court that he needs the monies seized by the Government in April 2021…The Government’s Motion also aggregated the financial information proffered by the Defendant. Except I’d like to draw your attention to page 4 of the Government’s Jan 2022 Opposition —it is clear the Defendant is not being forthcoming and to date has failed to provide the Government, the Court and PreTrial Services with an accurate accounting of cash (liquidity) other assets, other sources of income. In non-legalese Defendant Sullivan is playing a game of hide the cast from the Government and the Court…

…defendant put his monthly expenses at “$2,000-$2,250.” The defendant’s reply to his motion for release of funds then placed his monthly household needs at $4,800. The defendant’s reconsideration motion now again increases his monthly household needs to $6,018.44 ($72,221 per year) – over three times what he reported upon arrest.

• January 4, 2022 - Minute Entry for proceedings held Via VTC before Judge Emmet G. Sullivan (see DDC-ECF for docket report)

  • Arraignment/Status Conference as to JOHN EARLE SULLIVAN held on 1/4/2022. Defendant Consents To This Hearing Being Held Via VTC. Plea Of Not Guilty entered by JOHN EARLE SULLIVAN On Counts 1ss, 2ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss, 7ss, 8ss. Government Informs The Court In Regards To Discovery. Defendant Sullivan was arraigned on the forth superseding indictment that’s what was one of the purposes for the Jan4th hearing

  • The Court Will Stay Any Further Briefing By The Government In Regards To 62 Motion To Dismiss Case Motion to Dismiss Count 1 of Superseding Indictment and Motion to Adopt and Join Motion in 21-cr-28. Pending Motions Are Tolling Speedy Trial Time.

  • Next Status Conference set for 3/4/2022 at 1:30 PM in Telephonic/VTC before Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. Bond Status of Defendant: APPEARED VIA VTC - REMAINS ON PERSONAL RECOGNIZANCE;

The Courts rejected the very same arguments…

Yet undeterred by the finding of facts from the Court (in USA v Caldwell) -had previously elucidated (as it relates to USA v Caldwell) it seems like Defendant Sullivan is undeterred and now seeks to incorporate the very same arguments. As correctly articulated by the Government in their January 10, 2022 Response:

• January 10, 2022 RESPONSE by USA as to JOHN EARLE SULLIVAN re 64 MOTION for Joinder United States' Motion to Adopt and Join Three Pleadings in 21-CR-28 and Opposition to Defendant's "Motion to Adopt and Join Relevant Portions of Motion to Dismiss Count 2 of the Indictment in United States v. Caldwell, 21-CR-28 (APM) and to Dismiss Count 1 of This Superseding Indictment" (also see Scribd Link for the Government’s January 10, 2022 Response)

…The defendant’s motion sought “the joinder and adoption” of arguments made by Caldwell defendants seeking dismissal of counts charging violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2) in “the interests of judicial economy.” D.E. 62 at 3. That is, the motion sought to join and adopt those arguments to seek dismissal of Count 1 of the superseding indictment in this case.

At the status hearing on January 4, 2022, the undersigned noted her intent to file the government’s responsive pleadings from 21-CR-28 in opposition to the defendant’s motion to dismiss Count 1. The Court decided to stay all briefing. On January 5, 2022, the Court entered a minute order lifting the stay and requesting a response…

Those three pleadings are attached as exhibits, and unless directed by the Court to respond otherwise, the government respectfully submits the arguments therein in opposition to the arguments adopted and joined by the defendant’s motion to seek dismissal of Count 1.

You can read more about the ongoing Oath Keepers here and you can read more about USA v Caldwell here - although I should apologize I haven’t been keeping up to date on the Caldwell case and more broadly the Oath Keepers, as my long time readers are accustomed to. I’ve been otherwise preoccupied but I’m also mindful that readers could be come slightly overwhelmed by the sheer volume of PreTrial filings…so I like to pace myself… that said I don’t think Defendant Sullivan did himself any favors with his two recently filed motions.

Defendant Sullivan failed to carry the burden, at no time did he argue the court errored in its previous adjudication concerning the seized funds. But I’m completely vexed why Defendant Sullivan’s Defense counsel thought it would be smart to regurgitate previous arguments the Court flat out rejected -in USA v Caldwell. So for now I think you’re pretty much up to speed.

Wait isn’t this how most normal people spend their lunchtime? I’m sorry I can’t help but laugh at those who continue to espouse I don’t actually have a job. And that my actual J-O-B most certainly does not include tweeting or perseverating about incongruent conspiracy theories. Incidentally just because you don’t work for an employer that has over 1,500 employees - did you know what IT trouble ticket system via critix offers a full life cycle of IT issues. Stop with your ongoing smears because eventually your lies and smears will catch up to you…

This is your last and final warning otherwise I’ll go full nuclear spicy on you.