5 Comments

So this negates the struggle/court fight between AWS and Microsoft around all the fairness and government procurement standards? Cool.

Expand full comment
author

TBD but yes I think that’s a possible objective in this recent action but I’m not 100% positive - sitting at a strong 89% tho😂

Expand full comment

There's something I have never understood. With all of the data accessed and/or stored by and for DoD and other gov't offices... "Microsoft Corporation (Microsoft) and Amazon Web Services (AWS), as available market research indicates that these two vendors are the only Cloud Service Providers (CSPs) capable of meeting the Department’s requirements." There are hundreds of talented folks already employed by gov. Why can't they create their own "cloud service"? Yeah, I'm over simplifying it, but it can't possibly be out of reach...

Expand full comment
author

Agreed but NSF has been chronically under funded and under staffed for years - plus you have the whole alphabet soup wanting to claim jurisdiction but I would think that it would make sense the DOD should look at their enterprise system capabilities. I know the IRS & VA beta test programs before it’s fully deployed and they do it in a secured cloud environment -but you’re talking to an old school telco nerd who made P2P a thing and private clouds a thing too

Expand full comment

that makes 2 nerds present and accounted for...

Expand full comment