I wonder if Donald Trump is worried - he should be. His insane tax deductions for his three conservation easements are going to come back and haunt him and that delights me.
Jeez Louise Filey! I'm glad you have a mind like a steel trap because mine is spinning like a whirligig in a tornado! 🌪️🌪️🌪️ But I think I'm taking away the most salient point . . . CONSERVATION EASEMENTS! That's the thing to be on lookout for. Again, thanks for another great article. I sure hope your family don't resent the time you spend explaining this stuff to us. But you really are doing a public service. 😊
'He [trump] will go down for tax evasion by way of Conservation Easements & Insurance Fraud.' MUSIC TO MY EARS...😎 TY for showing us the VIABLE legal pathway to take down mobsters, Filey!💛
Oh and bank fraud. that one alone is scary, a full page FBI warning is in many loan packages now post 2007 mortgage meltdown.
I'm wondering who signs the final loan documents in Trump world ? Donald Sr. or one of the kids as an officer of Trump Corporation, looking at you Don Jr.
I don't give a flyin shit WHAT they get him on. I want them to get him and nail his dick to the wall. (I was gonna say ass, but I want it to hit him where he thinks he's king)
What happened on the E Jean Carroll suit is disgusting. I'm more than just a little disappointed in AG Garland and the DOJ today...
Agreed -I’m good with Toadie getting nailed. Incidentally I had planned on punishing an article about AG Garland and the E Jean Carroll suit. I know that it’s a highly emotional case. I’m not sure me explaining what the calculus is by AG Garland beyond it’s a threshold matter and one could argue it’s a quasi case of 1st impression. I’m short Carroll argued that Trump isn’t an “employee of the government” for purposes of the FTCA and the Westfall Act —therefore the Federal Torts Claim Act and Westfall Act are not applicable meaning the DOJ argued
“Nothing in the text, purpose, or history of the statutes suggests that they exempt from their coverage the President of the United States”
Not sure I understand... “Nothing in the text, purpose, or history of the statutes suggests that they exempt from their coverage the President of the United States”
Jeez Louise Filey! I'm glad you have a mind like a steel trap because mine is spinning like a whirligig in a tornado! 🌪️🌪️🌪️ But I think I'm taking away the most salient point . . . CONSERVATION EASEMENTS! That's the thing to be on lookout for. Again, thanks for another great article. I sure hope your family don't resent the time you spend explaining this stuff to us. But you really are doing a public service. 😊
And Mah job here is done <snort>
'He [trump] will go down for tax evasion by way of Conservation Easements & Insurance Fraud.' MUSIC TO MY EARS...😎 TY for showing us the VIABLE legal pathway to take down mobsters, Filey!💛
I had to stop and read as soon as I saw Conservation Easments (eyeing that lovely state, Florida). Way to go, Filey.
"easements"
Mama I knew whatcha meant - but I’ve been saying this for 4.5+ years and I’m unequivocal it’s gonna be conservation easements..
TGIF (Marie whispers Broidy, Jho Low, Pras Michel. Makes popcorn)
Want the superseding indictment?
Oh, and how! But later, time to relax and enjoy the weekend!
＼（＾○＾）人（＾○＾）／ || ψ(｀∇ ´ )ψ
Hey hey hey - I find tax fraud, insurance fraud, and wire fraud extremely sexy - haha
Oh and bank fraud. that one alone is scary, a full page FBI warning is in many loan packages now post 2007 mortgage meltdown.
I'm wondering who signs the final loan documents in Trump world ? Donald Sr. or one of the kids as an officer of Trump Corporation, looking at you Don Jr.
I don't give a flyin shit WHAT they get him on. I want them to get him and nail his dick to the wall. (I was gonna say ass, but I want it to hit him where he thinks he's king)
What happened on the E Jean Carroll suit is disgusting. I'm more than just a little disappointed in AG Garland and the DOJ today...
Agreed -I’m good with Toadie getting nailed. Incidentally I had planned on punishing an article about AG Garland and the E Jean Carroll suit. I know that it’s a highly emotional case. I’m not sure me explaining what the calculus is by AG Garland beyond it’s a threshold matter and one could argue it’s a quasi case of 1st impression. I’m short Carroll argued that Trump isn’t an “employee of the government” for purposes of the FTCA and the Westfall Act —therefore the Federal Torts Claim Act and Westfall Act are not applicable meaning the DOJ argued
“Nothing in the text, purpose, or history of the statutes suggests that they exempt from their coverage the President of the United States”
Not sure I understand... “Nothing in the text, purpose, or history of the statutes suggests that they exempt from their coverage the President of the United States”
Does that mean they CAN fight?