Are. You. Kidding, Me? The fact Special Counsel Durham filed this motion with less than three months until Sussman’s trial begins is the dirty of dirtiest prosecution playbook. Hence I’m NOT impressed
I'm still awake too. While this entire argument is the WEAKEST of sauce, I can only seeing this continuing to PISS OFF what appears to be an ALJ who is quickly losing patience with Durham, and not even covertly implying he is acting in bad faith at these late dates. This may very well be a bridge too far, and they have had SO MANY hearings, from initial indictments, the many, many, many motions and discovery leading up to this point, all of the attempts to change dates, and have a speedy trial, etc. The opportunity and requirement to have brought this concern to the courts attention at those dates and hearings, which again, have been plentiful, is going to be seen for the shell game this is. This is not an unqualified ALJ, who is going to be fooled by non-existent cell phone data, "I can't recall" and "Now I am confused" 12th hour filings where the entire premise of the case is blown to smithereens in January, this is just putting the last quiver in the argument to dismiss the case. Clear misconduct, obfuscation, and delay tactics.
Clearly you need to cut yourself off at 2 1/2 cups. I still remember how great coffee tasted the first time I tried it. It was before my third birthday and my grandma have me a spoonful :)
You seem nervous. Allow me to say this: Sussman’s response was released late yesterday. I love a defendant who accuses the accuser of perpetrating the accusations made against him. It’s a lovely defense. He’s accusing Durham of playing politics and teaming up with Fox News. Classic. Can’t make it up! That’s exactly what he did. Sound like a guilty conscious to me.
I'm still awake too. While this entire argument is the WEAKEST of sauce, I can only seeing this continuing to PISS OFF what appears to be an ALJ who is quickly losing patience with Durham, and not even covertly implying he is acting in bad faith at these late dates. This may very well be a bridge too far, and they have had SO MANY hearings, from initial indictments, the many, many, many motions and discovery leading up to this point, all of the attempts to change dates, and have a speedy trial, etc. The opportunity and requirement to have brought this concern to the courts attention at those dates and hearings, which again, have been plentiful, is going to be seen for the shell game this is. This is not an unqualified ALJ, who is going to be fooled by non-existent cell phone data, "I can't recall" and "Now I am confused" 12th hour filings where the entire premise of the case is blown to smithereens in January, this is just putting the last quiver in the argument to dismiss the case. Clear misconduct, obfuscation, and delay tactics.
His entire investigation feels like it's ultimately a nothing burger as he brings forth the weakest of findings. What a waste of time and resources.
I hope you take a nice long nap today.
Clearly you need to cut yourself off at 2 1/2 cups. I still remember how great coffee tasted the first time I tried it. It was before my third birthday and my grandma have me a spoonful :)
Filey… I didn’t read your whole article, while I was skimming it I searched Sussman’s name and found this in the Daily Mail rag.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10506599/Hillary-Clintons-campaign-paid-tech-firm-infiltrate-Trump-Tower-White-House-servers.html
It looks like the Durham insinuations and alleged ties are being used by Trump to allege Treason of all things.
You seem nervous. Allow me to say this: Sussman’s response was released late yesterday. I love a defendant who accuses the accuser of perpetrating the accusations made against him. It’s a lovely defense. He’s accusing Durham of playing politics and teaming up with Fox News. Classic. Can’t make it up! That’s exactly what he did. Sound like a guilty conscious to me.