My position on these Criminal cases remains changed. I believe that Durham’s office is engaging in selective prosecution which is mainly buttressed by political motivations. This is now the 4th time
I am 99.4% certain I would have Durham in tears if he tried to bring this to actual trial because it is completely confounding and I had a court reporter speak on the record for for the 1st time in 6+ years to repeat my mockery last week for 'less' than this (then the ALJ repeated, on the record to clarify,...really just to get in on the comedy trio..), Sussman needs to try to dismiss, I think he has a good chance of success. It is at least worth trying. There is a very good argument to be made. This entire update is circular, dates and statements are wrong, and counter one another and he can completely argue misrepresentation. I believe deliberate. I'd 'prebuttal' everything they had, cross reference every single inconsistency. Note that their own documentation does not support their stated case, argument or charges, throwing in passive aggressive, "I'm just confused. Are their exhibits and documents missing? I just want to be thorough. Oh, there is not? I am sure it was not their intention, but nonetheless, here we are....." and he's a mess.
As for this chump, it sounds like Durham needs more time constantly because there is really nothing to find, and the entire investigation sounds like Benghazi 2.0. Didn't trump order this as revenge for the Mueller investigation after all?
I am 99.4% certain I would have Durham in tears if he tried to bring this to actual trial because it is completely confounding and I had a court reporter speak on the record for for the 1st time in 6+ years to repeat my mockery last week for 'less' than this (then the ALJ repeated, on the record to clarify,...really just to get in on the comedy trio..), Sussman needs to try to dismiss, I think he has a good chance of success. It is at least worth trying. There is a very good argument to be made. This entire update is circular, dates and statements are wrong, and counter one another and he can completely argue misrepresentation. I believe deliberate. I'd 'prebuttal' everything they had, cross reference every single inconsistency. Note that their own documentation does not support their stated case, argument or charges, throwing in passive aggressive, "I'm just confused. Are their exhibits and documents missing? I just want to be thorough. Oh, there is not? I am sure it was not their intention, but nonetheless, here we are....." and he's a mess.
Safe travels home!
As for this chump, it sounds like Durham needs more time constantly because there is really nothing to find, and the entire investigation sounds like Benghazi 2.0. Didn't trump order this as revenge for the Mueller investigation after all?
Thank you for another relevant and unpleasant deep dive - and this guy's supposed to strike fear in the libs? Smooth sailing, Spicy <3
Is this Durham's attempt to be let out of this fools errand he was sequestered into? Awe shucks due to an error we need to collapse this malfeasance.