In terms of the causal vernacular YES, you could say; “the Jan 6th insurrection was an act of domestic terrorism” -note “act of” and Terrorism versus Terrorist” these distinctions matter
I love your work; have done so for years. You always deal in facts. Your analysis is billions-of-years-old, rock solid. Thank you for continuously informing us. I hope this format is helpful for you & your family; and that you eventually receive serious compensation for expertise shared selflessly. Thank you to the Nth degree.
i believe the planning in all of this was deep and complex and we are just barely scratching at it. i think we must remain vigilant. these angry phucks don't seem to be done yet.
Agreed but I wanted to make sure my readers had a source of documents and a quasi fulsome explanation as it relates to domestic terrorism in the vacuum of the Jan 6th insurrection
Thanks for taking the time to read it - I tried hard to source every document because I want my readers to have access to the root documents. I debated yes/no on publishing this article and in the end went with “yes” because I want my readers to be informed
I share your alarm. Especially given what the “acting” USCP Chief testified to earlier this week. I think the push to put this in the rear view mirror is a political calculation and self serving short term interest. I’m in the camp of “it’s in the rear view mirror” once the defendants stand trial and are sentenced. But rushing to turn the page seems, unwise
"radicalized Americans" Radicalized by other "Americans", not criticized by current government officials. Would we call "state sponsored terrorism"? And when do we think those "Americans" that are sponsoring, be outed?
That’s a bit more nuanced because you’d have to prove a nexus and likely an exchange of funds. I know that’s probably not what you want to hear but that’s what the facts lead me to - which is why comparing Foreign (state sponsored) Terrorism to Domestic Terrorism isn’t always the best choice. But then again I’m not a subject matter expert so it is okay to disagree with me, I won’t take it personally...
I understand, not completely, but... I am hoping that any congress persons that paid for the buses are identified and held accountable. Yeah, I know it will never happen, but one can always dream.
I love your work; have done so for years. You always deal in facts. Your analysis is billions-of-years-old, rock solid. Thank you for continuously informing us. I hope this format is helpful for you & your family; and that you eventually receive serious compensation for expertise shared selflessly. Thank you to the Nth degree.
i believe the planning in all of this was deep and complex and we are just barely scratching at it. i think we must remain vigilant. these angry phucks don't seem to be done yet.
Agreed but I wanted to make sure my readers had a source of documents and a quasi fulsome explanation as it relates to domestic terrorism in the vacuum of the Jan 6th insurrection
Once again, you take your time to help us understand! Cannot thank you enough!
Thanks for taking the time to read it - I tried hard to source every document because I want my readers to have access to the root documents. I debated yes/no on publishing this article and in the end went with “yes” because I want my readers to be informed
Thank you for laying this information out. I’m increasingly alarmed at the notion we should put this in the rear view mirror and move on.
I share your alarm. Especially given what the “acting” USCP Chief testified to earlier this week. I think the push to put this in the rear view mirror is a political calculation and self serving short term interest. I’m in the camp of “it’s in the rear view mirror” once the defendants stand trial and are sentenced. But rushing to turn the page seems, unwise
I appreciate your reporting!
I appreciate you reading it and dealing with my typos and grammar faux pas <snort>
Thank you again for laying it out for US. We are so blessed that you share your knowledge and incredible amount of time that it takes to dig to do so.
My pleasure- glad to be of help.
"radicalized Americans" Radicalized by other "Americans", not criticized by current government officials. Would we call "state sponsored terrorism"? And when do we think those "Americans" that are sponsoring, be outed?
That’s a bit more nuanced because you’d have to prove a nexus and likely an exchange of funds. I know that’s probably not what you want to hear but that’s what the facts lead me to - which is why comparing Foreign (state sponsored) Terrorism to Domestic Terrorism isn’t always the best choice. But then again I’m not a subject matter expert so it is okay to disagree with me, I won’t take it personally...
I understand, not completely, but... I am hoping that any congress persons that paid for the buses are identified and held accountable. Yeah, I know it will never happen, but one can always dream.