Criminal Complaint, Indictment, and current state of play for their criminal case(s) - specifically USCA-DC Appeal. There are a lot of files and I make zero apologies to ensure my readers have access
Yes and No - intent goes into state of mind, what USCA-DC did by remanding back to DC is it’s giving the DC Judge a chance to further expound on his reasoning(s) re dangerousness. Procedurally I know why the USCA-DC rationale to remand...because they held the District Court Judge failed to explain. In the long term this is actually a good thing - I know that sounds like a non-answer but it really is a decent answer
My pleasure- it total I think there are 19 separate court filings but I made a judgement call to start at the beginning and build to the recent USDA-DC order/memo -because it all interplays and I was trying to be aa thorough - yet concise as possible
I may have inadvertently neglected to provide you the March 26, 2021 USCA-DC Memo/Order
https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf
Link to the Order👇🏻
https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/BADED97229B05665852586A40047F49A/$file/21-3010-1891811.pdf
Is intent considered when determining whether detention is required? I mean, intent was all over their actions.
Yes and No - intent goes into state of mind, what USCA-DC did by remanding back to DC is it’s giving the DC Judge a chance to further expound on his reasoning(s) re dangerousness. Procedurally I know why the USCA-DC rationale to remand...because they held the District Court Judge failed to explain. In the long term this is actually a good thing - I know that sounds like a non-answer but it really is a decent answer
Super interesting, and way more thorough than Twitter sound bites, as usual, thank you again.
My pleasure- it total I think there are 19 separate court filings but I made a judgement call to start at the beginning and build to the recent USDA-DC order/memo -because it all interplays and I was trying to be aa thorough - yet concise as possible