Defendant Jenna “IRS Lien” Ryan -Aug 19th Guilty Plea -$500 for restitution
Took a private jet to “storm the Capitol” and later stated it was “One of the best days of my life" - clearly the USAO-DC hasn’t reviewed her social media accounts but $500 in restitution GTFOH…
Case Background as to Defendant Jenna Ryan;
In the days leading up to January 6, 2021 -Defendant Jenna Ryan took to social media to not only humble brag about flying on a private jet from the Dallas-Fort Worth area to Washington DC -but she went on to post pictures and uploaded numerous videos of her criminal actions —see article here
Remember Defendant Jenna Ryan set up a “legal Defense Fund’ and shortly after public reporting PayPal took her fundraising campaign down and after significant backlash GiveSendGo 1 2 3 also 404’d her legal defense fundraising to whit Defendant Ryan used/promoted her GiveSendGo campaign on her own website -some one actually captured a screen recording of Defendant Ryan’s Twitter meltdown and her legal defense fund.
Your prerequisite multimedia presentation…
I am mindful that at tines I dump a lot of files and sometimes it can be information overload. Which is why I typically create a video that brings the documents to life. As you’ll undoubtedly note when I say I went hunting for receipts I ended up going back to almost 1 decade
Technically speaking I’m surprised the USAO-DC didn’t add “obstructing a lawful criminal investigation” and/or “destruction or tampering with evidence” given the Defendant deleted this thread (and countless other social media post. Conversely this YouTuber user managed to capture a lot of data prior to Defendant Ryan’s deleting spree. Which she was arrested and charged..
Two days, yes a mere two days after she was arrested
Defendant Ryan let her racist and anti-mask flag fly…dallastexastv -“…RaceTrac doesn’t let Jenna Ryan buy anything because she enters the store without a mask. She says it’s because she’s Caucasian”
Her self entitlement is on full display during this Jan 2021 local CBS affiliate interview (after her arrest) which was 31 flavors of disjunction junction. Again it’s as if Defendant Ryan was basking in the glory of her newly found “celebrity” and completely out of touch with the DOJ reality
Relevant Court Filings;
Many of the Court documents can be accessed via the USAO-DC Capitol Violence Database as to Defendant Jennifer “Jenna” Ryan;
https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/defendants/ryan-jennifer-leigh
However the rest of the various Court Filings, February 2021 to present are not included in the aforementioned USAO-DC database. I’ve taken the liberty of curating the important court followings and uploaded them. That way you have access and are not forced to pay an arm & leg for them. After all the “sharing is caring” doctrine is a core reason I continue to publicly report.
February 16, 2021 — SUPERSEDING INFORMATION as to JENNIFER LEIGH RYAN (1) count(s) 1s, 2s, 3s, 4s, JASON LEE HYLAND (2) count(s) 1, 2, 3, 4, KATHERINE STAVELEY SCHWAB (3) count(s) 1, 2, 3, 4 see DDC-ECF
June 7, 2021 - second SUPERSEDING INFORMATION as to JENNIFER LEIGH RYAN (1) count(s) 1ss, 2ss, 3ss, 4ss, JASON LEE HYLAND (2) count(s) 1s, 2s, 3s, 4s, KATHERINE STAVELEY SCHWAB (3) count(s) 1s, 2s, 3s, 4s, 5s. (the only change is Defendant Schwab was additionally charged with Count 5. See DDC-ECF for SR2 or via https://www.scribd.com/document/520872161/USA-v-Jenna-Ryan-2nd-Superseding-Info-June-2021
Defendant Jenna Ryan epitome of White Privileged
Given Defendant Jenna Ryan’s financial history, as astutely reported by the Washington Post in their February 10 2021 article. At the time of Ryan’s arrest she owed over $37,000 in unpaid taxes to that end the IRS actually took out a lien:
Ryan had struggled financially for years. She was still paying off a $37,000 lien for unpaid federal taxes when she was arrested. She’d nearly lost her home to foreclosure before that. She filed for bankruptcy in 2012 and faced another IRS tax lien in 2010.
…But now — facing federal charges and abandoned by people she considered “fellow patriots” — she said that she feels betrayed by Trump….I bought into a lie, and the lie is the lie, and it’s embarrassing… I regret everything.”
In this January 18, 2021 Today Show interview with Defendant Jenna Ryan, note how she continually down plays her role. How she repeatedly stated she’s being persecuted for supporting president Trump. “I have the right to feel this way..I’m an honest person and if I felt I was in danger I would have been outta there?
The equivocation in this interview is galling
“If it comes down to War, guess what I’m going to be there… I didn’t do anything wrong…but Trump please pardon me…”
And yes I’ve been highly critical of the “acting” US Attorney for DC but this is just another data point that makes me wonder if the “acting” US Attorney is really administering equal justice. One would think that an unsatisfied IRS Tax Lien would give the Prosectors a moment of pause and question if the Defendant truly entered negotiations in “good faith” -I’d argue absolutely not and I hope the Court throws her into prison for the maximum allowable, of six months.
Because what most won’t tell you is Defendant Jenna Ryan should have also been charged with obstructing a lawful investigation and tampering with evidence. After her arrest, Defendant Ryan deleted hundreds of tweets and Facebook post. Again you don’t have to agree with me but there are in fact two distinct judicial systems. And Defendant Jenna Ryan is the poster child for “White privilege” and I find her conduct offensive. But I also find the “acting” US Attorney’s handling of the January 6th Domestic Terrorist 4
Yet in March 26, 2021 Defendant Jenna Ryan Tweeted this (also archived)
Defendant Jenna Ryan’s plea agreement
One thing that is really hard to square is surly the USAO-DC had to be aware of Defendant Ryan’s prolific social media post. And when you start reviewing her Jan6th videos, pictures and comments. When parties are negotiating a plea agreement, it’s expected that both parties enter into the talks “in good faith” —thus presents a quagmire
PLEA AGREEMENT as to JENNIFER LEIGH RYAN —see DDC-ECF - as plea agreements go this is pretty broiler plate - however I highlighted some deviations in Defendant Jenna Ryan’s Plea Agreement. See page 2, paragraph 3, which reads in part:
..to review any social media accounts..
“…allow law enforcement agents to review any social media accounts operated by your client for statements and postings in and around January 6, 2021…conduct interview of your client regarding the events in and around January 6, 2021 prior to sentencing…” (emphasis added)
Culling of her social media accounts
In order to understand why I specifically highlighted Page 2, Paragraph 3 of Defendant Ryan’s Plea Agreement. As set forth below, a very small sampling of her social media accounts. This could be quasi problematic for the Government, on a variety of fronts;
Defendant Ryan deleted hundreds of Tweets & Facebook Post
Defendant Ryan also deleted at least “2 IG Stories”
Defendant Ryan also deleted numerous TikTok videos
The issue @dotjenna does not appear to be contrite about her role during the January 6th Domestic Terror attack. If anything she’s gaslighting most of her followers. Defendant Jennifer “Jenna” Ryan does not even seem to understand that the Court could sentence her to the maximum allowable— six months in prison. But like you I have a helluva lot of questions for the “acting” US Attorney for DC. For Example did you even look at her social media accounts?
TikTok @dotjenna
Twitter @dotjenna
GETTR @dotjenna
August 11, 2021 Defendant Ryan’s Music Video
Youtube SelfLoveU channel
Youtube First Place Real Estate channel
YouTube DotJenna Channel
The following YouTube Video includes video snippets that Defendant Ryan had posted on her Facebook account but subsequently deleted those Facebook Videos. You’ll note how incredibly cavalier Defendant Ryan is.
If you listen closely to Defendant Ryan’s February 2021 YouTube Video -she states her name is “Jennifer Rogers” —my assumption is she’s smart enough to know her “Jenna Ryan” public persona is irreparable. So she’s “rebranding” her public persona post Jan6th. As you’ll note the tweet above shows it’s actually Jennifer “Jenna” Ryan —this is her “new” YouTube Channel -the point is Defendant Jenna Ryan has numerous aliases: Jennifer Rogers, Jenn Ryan, Jenna Ryan, Jenna Rogers, Lynne Ryan etc
I spent entirely too much time reading through her various social media accounts, do you wouldn’t need to. Defendant Ryan isn’t just a MAGA-QANON - she’s a super fan-girl. Of the various (but primarily now deleted) social media videos, I noticed she stated: I’m willing to die before I’ll let someone steal the election… this is war…we are coming for you…this June 15, 2021 Tweet where Defendant Jenna Ryan espoused Jan6th was an inside job and it was Antifa
Unfortunately we are talking about the epitome of “white privilege” and Defendant Jenna Ryan doesn’t actually believe she did anything unlawful and that she’s being bullied. Bless her little heart, no honey you’re not being bullied you are facing the harsh reality of the Court of Public Opinion. So save your subterfuge “woe is me, I’m the victim” narrative.
Typically if your attorney tells you to “cool it” on your social media and then proceeds to explain how vulnerable you are because the Court hasn’t issued your sentence. Common sense dictates that it is impertinent to That the Court is given wide latitude to impose a sentence that is different than what you & the Government agreed to vis-a-vis your plea agreement —this is colloquially known as—
👆🏻Prior Acts Yo👇🏻
meaning that at sentencing judges often factor in “prior acts” -Moreover discretion afforded to Federal Judges at sentencing is pretty broad. Not to belabor this point, but defendant Ryan should probably zip it on social media until after she is sentenced. I can not see any competent defense attorney encouraging a client to post on social media. As you can imagine I suspect the PreSentencing Report would include her copious social media post —and yes you could argue first Amendment.
Because Defendant Jenna Ryan’s plea Agreement meant she plead guilty to a misdemeanor which carries a maximum sentence of 6 months in prison. The question should be;
was the USAO-DC actually aware of the Defendant’s prolific social media accounts,
when did the USAO-DC contact the IRS who obtained a >$37K tax lien against the Defendant?
the alarming rate in which the Defendant is spewing provable disinformation and misinformation about the January 6th Domestic Terror attack, if so then the “acting” US Attorney for DC has some serious explaining to do
As the preliminary research suggest Defendant Ryan has not accepted full or any responsibility for her actions. And frankly it appears to be replete of any contrition for her overt acts. So again why did the USAO-DC negotiate a plea agreement in “good faith” with a defendant who clearly doesn’t give a F about what she did on January 6th…
A further review of Defendant Jenna Ryan’s other social media accounts, for example, her Gettr account. —is well here you can take a look, she’s “reposting” actual disinformation and misinformation at an incredibly vulgar rate:
https://gettr.com/user/dotjenna - Defendant Jenna Ryan’s “repost” archived
For Example see page 2, specifically paragraph 4
”However the United States expressly reserves its rights to prosecute your client for any crime of violence, as defined by 18 U.S.C. §16 and/or 22 D.C. Code §4501, if in fact your client committed or commits such a crime of violence prior to or after the execution of this agreement…
And as expected the Government will not seek to change Defendant Jenna Ryan’s conditions of release - on Page 6 of Defendant Ryan’s Plea Agreement you’ll note the Government is asking for the Defendant to pay $500 in restitution. During the August 19, 2021 telephonic/VTC plea hearing — Chief Judge Howell repeatedly questioned the Government why Defendant Ryan was only asked to pay $500 in restitution for Capitol damage. Conversely in a May 2021 hearing -Judge Cooper noted that he could impose a fine up to $5,000 on Defendant Ryan
Defendant Jenna Ryan Statement of Offense:
August 19, 2021 - STATEMENT OF OFFENSE by USA and JENNIFER LEIGH RYAN —see DDC-ECF -again the USAO-DC plea agreement with Defendant Jenna Ryan -she plead guilty to 40 U.S.C. §5104(e)(2)(G)
Which is punishable up to six months in prison pursuant to: 40 U.S.C. §5109(b) and a fine. As previously noted the USAO-DC and Defendant Jenna Ryan agreed to restitution in the amount of $500.00
And like I’d leave you high and dry without a link to the;
Plea Agreement https://www.scribd.com/document/520872407/USA-v-Jenna-Ryan-Aug-19th-Plea-Agreement
Statement of Offense https://www.scribd.com/document/520881439/USA-v-Jenn-Ryan-Statement-of-Offense-Aug-19th-Plea
So for now you should be completely caught up —what I’d look out for is her presentence report (by the Government and Defendant) because something tells me Defendant Jenna Ryan’s prolific social media post might end up biting her where the sun doesn’t shine and I certainly expect the USAO-DC to request at least three months of prison time for her…
As reported by Axios in the late afternoon of August 19, the Sentencing hearing of Robert Reeder was delayed after a “new” video surfaced - the Axios article reads in part;
“A federal judge delayed the sentencing of a Capitol rioter hours after video footage surfaced that allegedly showed him assaulting a police officer during the Jan. 6 insurrection.
Why this matters: Robert Reeder, of Maryland, was due to be sentenced Wednesday after pleading guilty to one misdemeanor count of parading, demonstrating or picketing in a Capitol building. But prosecutors requested a delay due to the new video evidence, tweeted by the Sedition Hunters, an online group seeking to hold Capitol rioters to account, per CNN.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Josh Rothstein told the court the delay would allow the prosecution time to review the video
Yes, she is definitely a poster child for “white privilege”. I say lock her up for a good long time
I checked her real estate brokers license status this morning, no pending action for license suspension or revocation shown. In California a misdemeanor conviction and jail would likely be a bye bye to a broker's license. Texas standards could be different. Perhaps the unspoken is the prosecutor is considering that she loses her ability to continue to make a living if she does jail time so she's only going to have the misdemeanor charge, no jail time and then perhaps keep her license? Months ago when I viewed her insurrectionist bragging videos and read her social media accounts my first thought was "Say bye bye to your real estate license silly girl " In my opinion her arrogant white privilege attitude is infuriating and she's an embarrassment to the profession. $35 Trump hat ? Westin hotel ? Shoulda stayed home and put that $ towards the tax lien ( Sorry not sorry for the snark )