Matty it is only going to get worse —Joel status conference and Friday arraignment (amended) new info
Matty are you scared? Do you think Daddy is going to get you out of your current (and ever growing) shitten-ing? daddy doesn’t have to juice to save you. Your own House GOP leaked about the pics
Matt Gaetz - continues to circle the drain of deep stupid. It is really unclear if Gaetz actually comprehends the totality of his legal exposure and the peril he is facing. You can read more here and here. Remember Joel Greenberg has a hearing on April 8, 2021 and Greenberg’s arraignment for the Superseding Indictment is currently scheduled for Friday April 9, 2021.
I mean even his fellow Republican members in the House are leaking about the Beta-Satan 2.0 showing nude pictures and videos of women he purportedly “bedded” <—gosh why does that sound so familiar. It’s like Beta-Satan Groundhog Day. And go figure that Gaetz’ only congressional support he’s getting is from QANON-Rep Marjorie Taylor-Green ((Q-GA 14) who’s undeniably a QANON-believer. The juxtaposition of Green defending Gaetz <—bejesus the familiarity of the host parasite relationship is creepy but also “so many sadz”
Blanket Pre-Emptive Pardon, don’t all innocent people make this kind of shameless “ask”?
In the final days of the Trump White House, Rep. Matt Gaetz is said to have asked for blanket pre-emptive pardons for himself and unidentified congressional allies. New York Times
In the final weeks of Mr. Trump’s term, Mr. Gaetz sought something in return. He privately asked the White House for blanket pre-emptive pardons for himself and unidentified congressional allies for any crimes they may have committed, according to two people told of the discussions.
If the New York Times report is accurate (I don’t have any reason to believe otherwise, of course setting aside my own personal distrust of one of the “by-line” reporters) then this certainly makes the following November 24, 2020 Gaetz’ Fox News Appearance in a slightly different light. Particularly this statement from Gaetz’s office
“…Entry-level political operatives have conflated a pardon call from Representative Gaetz — where he called for President Trump to pardon ‘everyone from himself, to his administration, to Joe Exotic’ — with these false and increasingly bizarre, partisan allegations against him,” the spokesman said in a statement. “Those comments have been on the record for some time, and President Trump even retweeted the congressman, who tweeted them out himself.”
Well that’s one helluva buried lede - in the New York Times Gaetz Pre-Emptive Pardon(s) Report —oddly yet predictably, by Gaetz’s own published-garbage book… it’s clear that Geatz views women as…
While the NYTs states it’s doesn’t know if Gaetz knew:
I am politely going to remind you of the following few details, that in my opinion are important and highly relevant (see previous article for court filings);
June 2020 Indictment (ECF or via my public drive) which charged Greenberg with violations of; 18 U.S.C. § 2261A(2) - Stalking and18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(7) - Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features, and information
July 2020, Superseding INDICTMENT (ECF or via my public drive) and returned in open court as to Joel Micah Greenberg (1) Count(s) 1s, 2s, 3s-4s, 5s-6. As you’ll note additional counts were added in the SR1. Which added aggregated identity theft - for two identities that belong to real people…
August 19, 2020, SECOND SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT returned in open court as to Joel Micah Greenberg (1) Counts 1ss - 12ss. (ECF or via my public drive) - note “Minor Victim” and trafficking
So the suggestion that Matt Gaetz didn’t know about the investigation or that Trump was unaware and the White House didn’t take Gaetz’s request seriously. I’m not buying that narrative.
Commonsense dictates of course Gaetz knew. To suggest otherwise is willfully naive or possibly complicit. I’m curious if the NYTs article was/is an attempt to help Team Trump distance themselves from Matt Gaetz. Come on, use your noodle and look at the series of court filings, overlay that on top of Gaetz’s podcast and tweets.
Remember this incontrovertible fact, it was the Trump’s Department of Justice (DOJ) that investigated Joel Greenberg. It was also Trump’s DOJ that debriefed Trump’s handpicked Attorney General Bill Barr on at least three separate occasions. And there’s zero public reporting that AG Barr told investigators to stand down (which is oddly surprising)… the leak about Gaetz’s pardon request legitimately can only originate from one source - Team Trump
Gaetz’s purported sex games while in the Florida state legislature
On the balance of course Latvala’s tweet is provocative, especially if you’re reading it in a vacuum sans the prerequisite background. For example: in the context of the son’s fathers also having a combative and discordant “working relationship”
But back in 2017 the Florida State Legislature was rocked by egregious sexual harassment allegations. And yes as a result Latvala’s father resigned from his position. Notwithstanding that doesn’t negate the distinct possibility that Gaetz could have been part of a group of lawmakers. Who made a "game" aka “look at me, I’m a super stud muffin, I slept with —insert name—and have the pictures (or video) to prove what a stud I am, wanna see them? …naturally the game’s rule required players to “pics or it didn’t happen”1
score their female sexual conquests, which granted "points" for various targets such as interns, staffers or other female colleagues in the state House. One of the targets of the scoring system was a group the lawmakers had heard were "virgins," according to a source. The scoring system by male Florida lawmakers was previously reported by the Miami Herald.
It’s almost like Florida’s very own “open secret” —Caputo previously worked for the Miami Herald and back in 2013 he tweeted this thread.
November 24, 2020 Gaetz’s FoxNews Segment
“President Trump should pardon Michael Flynn. He should pardon the Thanksgiving turkey. He should pardon everyone from himself to administration officials to Joe Exotic if he has to… You see from the radical left a bloodlust that will only be quenched if they come after the people who worked so hard to animate the Trump administration with the policies and the vigor and the effectiveness that delivered for the American people.”
And this might not matter to you but Gaetz’ push for pardons - specifically for (disgraced) Retired General Michael T Flynn was pardoned by Donald Trump on November 25, 2020, almost 24 hours after this insane segment on Fox News.
See Trump’s Twitter archive search regarding Flynn and the Pardon, which can be found here -On November 25, 2020 at 4:08:07EST Trump tweeted:
“…is my Great Honor to announce that General Michael T. Flynn has been granted a Full Pardon. Congratulations to @GenFlynn and his wonderful family, I know you will now have a truly fantastic Thanksgiving!”
Gaetz’s Twitter Pardon lobbying circa 2020:
And to prove what a vile and vengeful POS Gaetz is -
Before that disgusting December 13, 2020 jab at Rep Liz Cheney —Gaetz had already publicly explained why Trump should pardon Edward Snowden. Gaetz’s treachery can not be over stated. Edward Snowden is a traitor to America. He betrayed the public’s trust, while inflicting damage to our Intelligence Community. Snowden is a clear and present danger to our collective National Security. Period. Full Stop.
Not to be outdone before Gaetz went on his podcast - he tweeted this
But the facts remain that Gaetz was heavily lobbying for Trump to pardon Roger Stone for the better part of 8 months. Gaetz readily acknowledges that he’s known Roger Stone for well over a decade and Gaetz does think of Stone as a quasi-father figure. Matt’s relationship with his father isn’t all roses and gumdrops —there’s friction related to his family’s business, the control of a significant amount of money and in general Gaetz is not a chip off the old block. Baby Gaetz is a “stone chisle” that hits the “old block” over and over until it’s rock dust. Which is ironic because there might be a strong likelihood that Baby Gates might end up snorting it —thereby mistaking it for nose snow (I’m kidding, sort of)
On December 18, 2020 Gaetz published (which he does very sporadically) a new PodCast. Embedded a few minutes into his PodCast Gaetz issues what certainly sounds like “fight words” towards House Democrats. For the record the “speech and debate clause” does have significant limitations.
I think I know what one aspect of his Gaetz’s defense strategy; he’s going to say all his comments before/during/after the New York Times bombshell report “Gaetz being investigated for ‘possible’ child-sex-trafficking” was/is protected by the Speech and Debate Clause 2 34
JANUARY 2020 MICHAEL ESPOSITO
no really on January 3, 2020 I created and sourced the hell out of this Twitter Thread because 1)I know where and what to look for, 2) I know what I’m reading, and 3) I know the importance of what I’m reading. The fact that there’s been little to no follow after Esposito’s house/office being raided over 16 months ago - that kind of puts tonight’s NYT’s breaking news kind of important.
When I point blank tweeted at Gaetz about his coke-head, dealer and pot dispensary comment - I wasn’t being cheeky or hyperbolic. As previously explained on December 13, 2019 I tweeted this thread of what some view as a highly offensive tweet.
All I am saying is wait until Congress returns from recess because as of now Gaetz has very few supporters coming to his defense, also I would wait and see what happens tomorrow and on Friday as it relates to Gaetz’s buddy Greenberg…anyone know the over/under on Greenberg “ flip or flop”
Joel Greenberg so not flipping on Gaetz
WAIVER of of Defendant's Presence at Arraignment and Plea of Not Guilty as to Joel Micah Greenberg. See ECF or via my public drive - so there’s that fun-nugget of (not) awesomeness
to be clear I’m being intentionally snarky and I’m mindful that using “..…” implies a direction quotation from a real person. Those are not real quotes from a real person. But then again mis-using “….” <—as a weapon to mislead readers because the falsity of quote(s) —I just want to say thank you for helping building my file. Your rage wreaks of milquetoast Eau De Parfum-putain d'menteur
SCOTUS has held the Court voluminous case law that the First Amendment provides absolutely zero protection for; obscenity, child pornography, or speech which constitutes what has become known as this colloquialism “fighting words” - Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 483 (1957). However, Justice Douglas, dissenting, wrote: “[T]here is no special historical evidence that literature dealing with sex was intended to be treated in a special manner by those who drafted the First Amendment.” Id. at 514. —Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 27 (1973),
Furthermore SCOTUS has also held that the; First Amendment does not “provide full protection for; commercial speech, defamation (libel and slander), speech that may be harmful to children, speech broadcast on radio and television (as opposed to speech transmitted via cable or the Internet), and public employees’ speech” see Gravel v. United States, 408 US 606 - Supreme Court 1972, WL-CL-004681 Search
U.S. v. Stevens, 559 U.S. 460 (2010) (“Maybe there are some categories of speech that have been historically unprotected, but have not yet been specifically identified or discussed as such in our case law. But if so, there is no evidence that “depictions of animal cruelty” is among them. We need not foreclose the future recognition of such additional categories to reject the Government's highly manipulable balancing test as a means of identifying them.”).
,…
Full disclosure I updated the article to drill down further on “it’s unclear if Matt Geatz knew about the investigation” (this is why I’m typically suspect if Maggy is on the by-line). I added the indictments (from the 2 previous articles) and walked you through the dates of the various indictments —guess I should not have scheduled the publication in the middle of the night last night...
Perp walk, orange jumpsuit, tears, I'm here for all of it!